Outlook 2024
Annual Industry Ranking And Forecast
VIEW NOWPink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited
This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183
Printed By
The MHRA’s regulatory strategy on AI outlines key areas where this technology could be used to improve the agency’s own processes, and says that the use of AI to develop drugs will not change the questions it asks companies.
Similar to drug master files, MMFs would allow models to be reused, but critical issues, such as protection of proprietary information, still must be resolved.
Five novel agents are among the user fee goal dates coming up in May 2024.
China’s public payer perceives innovative drugs in a different way from that of the country’s top drug regulator, a former senior healthcare security official with knowledge of the matter reveals. The posture has unnerved pharma companies, which have been hit by sharp price discounts.
Read more Pink Sheet stories about regulatory and policy developments in Asia...
Keep up with latest biopharma regulatory and policy developments with Pink Sheet podcasts.
More PodcastsIn a year full of regulatory milestones for the firm, PTC Therapeutics hopes to set some approval precedents – and basically hopes its candidates have an easier time of it than they have had before.
Stay up to date on regulatory guidelines from around the world with the Pink Sheet's Guidance Tracker. The complete Global Pharma Guidance Tracker, with sortable and searchable listings going back to 2014, is available online.
The new tool provides a way of quantifying the degree of diversity by race/ethnicity, sex and age in clinical trials, but the results will not factor into the US health technology assessment body’s cost effectiveness determinations for new drugs.
There are pending requests to add 13 candidates to the tropical diseases that qualify for a priority review voucher, according to a Pink Sheet analysis, as FDA Commissioner Robert Califf faces congressional pressure on the years since the list's last update.
A major shift from unfettered coverage to prior authorizations was recorded by MMIT over the past year for the leading GLP-1/GIP agonist diabetes drugs. Public interest in using the drugs off label for weight loss drove the change.
FDA officials have said hiring could be slowed if an inflationary pay increase is not included in the agency budget, but CDER and CBER continue to add staff at a steady pace.
EMA charges participants to receive scientific advice through the fledgling program, unlike the US FDA, which may not fit the budgets of some complex generic sponsors. At the same time, sponsors also may simply not be aware the program exists yet.
Acknowledging that it may be a barrier to some extent, EMA’s senior scientific specialist of clinical pharmacology Kevin Blake notes that EU reference medicinal products are a legal requirement for bioequivalence studies and cannot be circumvented.
While EU preparations are underway to introduce strict legal requirements for all AI systems, the UK has doubled down on its flexible, non-regulatory framework. In this second of a two-part article, a lawyer explains the pros and cons of each for pharma and medtech firms.
Flexible thinking and rigorous standards will both be needed to develop psychedelics as drug therapies in order to surmount the many complicating factors, from unique ‘set and setting’ aspects to functional unblinding, speakers at Reagan-Udall Foundation meeting agree.
The new tool provides a way of quantifying the degree of diversity by race/ethnicity, sex and age in clinical trials, but the results will not factor into the US health technology assessment body’s cost effectiveness determinations for new drugs.
The FDA’s drug center has all but stopped holding meetings at this point, which begs the question: why do they want advice on how to make them better?
Shionogi’s UK general manager praised NHS England’s novel subscription model for antibiotics, but warned the country would be “wasting money” unless other global regulators introduced similar incentives for antimicrobial development.
The European Medicines Agency has published guidance on how to strengthen the supply chain for products included on the EU’s critical medicines list.
The bill on new rules on companies holding minimum stock levels for “critical medicines” has been amended but is still likely to take effect at the beginning of July.
An annual meeting of Asian pharma industry groups in Tokyo recognized the need for faster joint regulatory allowance for second suppliers to stabilize the supply chain, drive e-labeling for patients and expand universal healthcare to better cover expensive therapeutics.
At issue is a narrow jurisdictional ruling, not the constitutionality of the Medicare price negotiation program, US attorney reminds the judges.
The UK regulator says it wants to become an ‘enabler’ of clinical trials.
A list of EU biosimilar filings, CHMP opinions and EU marketing authorizations, including details of the biosimilar company, the brand name/INN, indication(s), the reference product/company, and the date and type of event.
More legal action in India that has the Bolar exception provision at its crux with Roche, in this instance warding off a local drug maker in the Evrysdi patent infringement case.
The US Medicare Payment Advisory Commission is analyzing two of the lower-cost segments of the US medicine marketplace: generic drugs and the 340B brand discount program. In both cases, there is a picture of complexity and unintended consequences to rival higher cost segments.
The fourth court loss for pharma in industry's attempts to kill Medicare’s drug price negotiation program adds to the list of reasons courts have rejected legal challenges to the Inflation Reduction Act.
All set! This article has been sent to my@email.address.
All fields are required. For multiple recipients, separate email addresses with a semicolon.
Please Note: Only individuals with an active subscription will be able to access the full article. All other readers will be directed to the abstract and would need to subscribe.