Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

A “Precedent-Setting” OTC Switch – And A Case Study In Disregarding FDA’s Advice

This article was originally published in RPM Report

Executive Summary

Galderma’s OTC switch application for the acne therapy Differin (adapalene 0.1% gel) cleared an important milestone with a unanimous vote in favor of approval from an FDA advisory committee April 15. FDA urged the committee to consider the application as “precedent setting” given the theoretical risk of teratogenicity – but one committee member was more worried about the bad precedent of approving an application for a sponsor that didn’t do a label comprehension study they way FDA requested.

You may also be interested in...



Reinventing OTCs: FDA Seeks New Models; Stakeholders Urge Renewed Focus

FDA convened a two-day hearing to solicit new ideas to replace the OTC drug monograph system as part of a broader look at ways to enhance the regulatory model for OTCs. However, the architects of the process strongly urged FDA not to overhaul the system – but instead focus more attention on it. At stake is whether FDA makes an all out push to increase OTC switches in coming years.

Partisan Politics Returns To US FDA Congressional Oversight

The US FDA has stood out as an agency that tends to draw broad bipartisan support amid a generally rancorous and divided Congress. A House hearing, however, may be a sign that those days are over.

Medicare Reaffirms Faith In Formulary Review Process Ahead Of Part D Changes

Dramatic transformation in the US Medicare Part D benefit design does not require any changes to CMS’ overall approach to reviewing formulary submissions from private drug plan sponsors, the agency says in its final guidance implementing the design changes for 2025.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS079915

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel