Pink Sheet is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

GMO Bills Differ On Labeling, But Agree On Pre-empting State Laws

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

H.R. 1599 would create a structure for codifying GMOs in foods and supplements and make labeling voluntary, but opponents say it keeps consumers in the dark while pre-empting state laws. S. 809 and H.R. 1699, meanwhile, would require labeling for genetically engineered products.

Advertisement

Related Content

NPA’s Wish List For Cosmetics Bill Includes GMPs, ‘Natural’ Definition
Supplement Self-Regulation Key To Preventing More Oversight – Heinrich

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register