Pink Sheet is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

TiO2 Prop 65 Dismissal Offers Lessons, Renews Hope For Industry

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

A win for industry in California Prop 65 litigation targeting titanium dioxide-containing cosmetics illustrates the importance of getting involved early in the listing process and challenging the factual basis for exposure claims. Morrison & Foerster attorney Michael Steel discusses the case and its takeaways.

Advertisement

Related Content

Sunscreen Ingredient GRASE Guidance Leaves Nanoparticle Gap – NPA
Sunscreen Makers Could Reel In ‘Superior’ Ingredients From Fish – Study
OEHHA Prop 65 Website Proposal Is Mixed Bag For Industry
Airborne TiO2 Of Respirable Size? Litigation Goes On Under Prop 65
TiO2-Containing Cosmetic Powders Subject Of Prop 65 Settlements
Cosmetics Firms Held “Hostage” By Prop 65 Litigators; Law Changes Possible
IARC Finds TiO2 Possibly Carcinogenic, Setting Stage For Prop 65 Action

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS107873

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

All set! This Question has been sent to my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Add a personalized Question to your Analyst

Cancel